职业本科教育趋同化风险和化解策略探赜——基于职业本科与应用型本科比较视角

    Exploration on the Risks of Convergence and Mitigation Strategies in Vocational Undergraduate Education: A Comparative Perspective of Vocational Undergraduate and Applied Undergraduate Education

    • 摘要: 作为高等教育的重要类型,职业本科与应用型本科教育同根于早期实业教育,在历史演进中,教育理念互鉴传承,在学科架构上专业设置既重叠又互补,人才培养规格因教育理念、学科架构和社会需求而异。当前,职业本科教育面临趋同化风险,具体表现为其教育功能受制度性同形机制影响而异化,背离职业本质;社会认同上因“拟态环境”等因素导致身份模糊、信任缺失;资源配置存在投入错配与产出低效问题。为规避趋同化风险,职业本科院校需要回归本质,锚定特色定位与目标架构,以多元协同构建人力资本供需对接、校企合作、数字校园新生态,重塑职业教育教学特色。通过创新驱动,以科教融汇为切入点,破解资源配置的路径依赖,实现差异化发展,明确差异化人才培养定位,完善人才培养模式和标准体系。

       

      Abstract: As an important type of higher education, vocational undergraduate education and applied undergraduate education share their roots in early industrial education. Throughout historical evolution, their educational philosophies have been mutually referenced and inherited. In terms of disciplinary architecture, their program offerings exhibit both overlap and complementarity, while talent cultivation specifications diverge based on educational philosophies, disciplinary structures, and societal demands. Currently, vocational undergraduate education confronts the risk of convergence, which is specifically manifested in three aspects: its educational functions are alienated and deviate from the vocational essence due to the influence of institutional isomorphism mechanisms; identity ambiguity and trust deficit arise in social recognition due to factors such as the "pseudo-environment"; resource allocation suffers from misinvestment and low-output inefficiencies. To circumvent the risk of convergence, vocational undergraduate colleges need to return to their essence, anchor characteristic positioning and target frameworks, construct a new ecosystem of human capital supply-demand alignment, school-enterprise collaboration, and digital campus through multi-stakeholder synergy, and reshape the teaching characteristics of vocational education. Driven by innovation, with the integration of science, technology, and education as the entry point, they should break the path dependence of resource allocation, achieve differentiated development, clarify the positioning of differentiated talent cultivation, and improve the talent cultivation model and standard system.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回